Ten questions, two minutes. At the end, a clear read of the real state of your risk assessment and of the action plan that should come out of it. Not a marketing score — an honest look.
A reminder, under the french Code du travail (L4121-3, R4121-1 and following): the risk assessment must be updated at least once a year from 11 employees, and a formal PAPRIPACT is mandatory from 50. This assessment is informative and does not replace legal advice.
Your risk assessment stands on its own. That is not the majority of SMEs, and it shows in your answers: recently updated, a plan that is followed, traceability in minutes. The room for progress here is fine grained, not fundamental.
The document exists, but it holds more by habit than by an actual system. This is the most common case: a handful of gaps is enough to turn a routine inspection into a bad surprise. Nothing alarming, but nothing solid either.
What you describe looks like a document produced once and then forgotten. That is exactly the scenario that costs the most in an inspection or after an accident — not because the content is bad, but because nothing proves it is followed. It is also the profile that gains the most, and the fastest, from changing method.
The detailed report is in your inbox. If it has not arrived in a couple of minutes, have a look in the spam folder.
Two or three places where what you just described stops being somebody's memory and starts being a system.
Fifteen minutes to look at your operational friction with you, and see which modules answer it.
